Senator Loren Legarda maintains her claim as the Senate President Pro Tempore amid dispute over recent Senate leadership changes she calls unconstitutional.
Senator Loren Legarda has reaffirmed her stance that the June 3 leadership changes in the Philippine Senate are invalid and unconstitutional, insisting she still holds the position of Senate President Pro Tempore. During a Senate session on June 3, Sherwin Gatchalian was appointed Senate President Pro Tempore and acting Senate President after a quorum of 12 senators was established, alongside the reorganization of several Senate committees.
Legarda contested the legitimacy of the appointments, stating that the Constitution and Senate rules require a different quorum for electing Senate officers. She emphasized that only 12 senators voted, below the 13 votes she says are mandated by the 1987 Constitution to appoint Senate leadership positions. She also argued that a Supreme Court ruling cited to justify the reorganization is outdated, dating back to the 1935 Constitution, and not applicable under the current constitutional framework.
In response, Sherwin Gatchalian acknowledged Legarda’s position but cited support from the Integrated Bar of the Philippines, law school deans, and former Senate presidents, who uphold the legality of the new leadership. Gatchalian added that the Civil Service Commission has begun recognizing his presidency and that Malacañang Palace supports the Gatchalian leadership.
Senator Robin Padilla commented that disagreements among senators are a normal part of democracy and should reassure the public that their taxes are properly utilized, warning instead that agreement without scrutiny could be cause for concern.
Former presidential spokesperson Harry Roque alleged on social media possible defections within the Senate leadership blocs linked to legal case dismissals, though no evidence was provided.
Gatchalian noted public frustration over the leadership dispute but urged focus on Senate work, indicating no special session has yet been scheduled and that the resolution lies with the full Senate.
Legal experts note that while the Avelino v. Cuenco Supreme Court ruling cited is from the 1935 Constitution era, its principles remain relevant since similar provisions are present in the 1987 Constitution, particularly regarding Senate quorums.
Sources referenced:
- https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/topstories/nation/990472/loren-legarda-senate-leadership-shakeup-unconstitutional/story/
