Solita Monsod, expert and former NEDA chief, warns that unprogrammed funds in the budget resemble a new type of pork barrel, risking development goals and fiscal accountability in the Philippines.
The Philippine Supreme Court recently heard arguments challenging the constitutionality of ‘unprogrammed appropriations’ included in the 2026 General Appropriations Act. Economist and former National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA) chief Solita Collas-Monsod appeared as amicus curiae to caution about the abuse of such funds, which she described as a modern, more complex form of pork barrel expenditure. She argued that these unprogrammed funds reduce transparency, weaken legislative oversight and accountability, and divert resources from critical development needs. Monsod emphasized that inefficiencies in this funding compromise the government’s ability to meet targets set out in the Philippine Development Plan (PDP), particularly in poverty reduction, health, and education. The petitions before the Court question whether legislative and executive powers have overstepped constitutional boundaries, resulting in misuse of public funds. The government, represented by the Solicitor General, defended the inclusion of flexible, ‘aspirational’ appropriations, highlighting the need for adaptability in budgeting to respond to economic changes. Despite this, Monsod maintained that the unprogrammed appropriations system undermines fiscal discipline and transparency, potentially increasing budget deficits. The debate underscores ongoing concerns about safeguarding public funds, ensuring accountability, and achieving sustainable development goals in the Philippines.
Sources referenced:
- https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/topstories/nation/982898/monsod-flags-abuse-in-unprogrammed-funding/story/